Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Feibelman v. Packard
108 U.S. 14
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1882-12-18
- Topic
- general
Mr. Chief Justice Waite delivered the opinion of the court. Moses Feibelman and (George Yoelker, as .partners, sued the defendants in error to recover .damages for the seizure of their-partnership goods by Packard, marshal of the United States for the District of Louisiana. A judgment was rendered .against them. Their interests in the suit were joint, and the judgment affects them jointly and not separately.' Feibelman alone has brought this writ of error, and there has been no summons and *15 severance, or other equivalent proceeding.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Feibelman v. Packard. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 17 opinions
delivered the opinion of the court.
Moses Feibelman and (George Yoelker, as .partners, sued the defendants in error to recover .damages for the seizure of their-partnership goods by Packard, marshal of the United States for the District of Louisiana. A judgment was rendered .against them. Their interests in the suit were joint, and the judgment affects them jointly and not separately.' Feibelman alone has brought this writ of error, and there has been no summons and *15 severance, or other equivalent proceeding. It follows that the writ must he dismissed, on the authority of Williams v. Ban k of the United States, 11 Wheat. 414; Masterson v. Herndon, 10 Wall 416; Simpson v. Greeley, 20 Wall. 152; and it is
/So ordered.