Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Merritt v. Park
108 U.S. 109
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1883-03-19
- Topic
- general
Me. Justice Blatchford delivered the opinion of the court. This is a suit to recover back duties exacted by the plaintiff in error, as collector of the port of New York, on glass bottles imported in March, 1879, from London. The bottles contained beer, and the defendant below exacted a specific* duty of 35 cents a gallon on the beer, .and also a duty of 30 per cent, ad valorem on the' bottles. The bottles were the ordinary ale bottles of commerce.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Merritt v. Park. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a suit to recover back duties exacted by the plaintiff in error, as collector of the port of New York, on glass bottles imported in March, 1879, from London. The bottles contained beer, and the defendant below exacted a specific* duty of 35 cents a gallon on the beer, .and also a duty of 30 per cent, ad valorem on the' bottles. The bottles were the ordinary ale bottles of commerce. The circuit court directed a verdict for the plaintiffs, and they had a judgment, to review which the collector brought this’writ of error.
The question involved is the same, and arose under the same statutory provisions, as in the case of Schmidt v. Badger, 107 U. S. 85. It ivas there held that such duty on the bottles, in addition to such duty on the beer and ale contained in them, was a laAvful duty. That decision governs the present case, and the judgment of the circuit court is reversed and the case is remanded to that court, Avith directions to grant a new trial.