Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Selig v. Pediatric Specialty Care, Inc.
551 U.S. 1142
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2007-06-25
- Topic
- bankruptcy
How later courts describe this case
- recognizing that only state officials, as opposed to state agencies, can be sued for prospective injunctive relief and dismissing claims against state agency
- recognizing that only state officials, as opposed to state agencies, can be sued for prospective injunctive relief in dismissing claims against state agency
- determining that Supreme Court decision handed down prior to mandate was not intervening
- “Judgment vacated with respect to the individual capacity claims … and case remanded … with instructions to dismiss the appeal as moot with respect to these claims.”
- providers can enforce § 1396a[a][30][A] through 42 U.S.C. § 1983
- MDMH was protected by the Eleventh Amendment
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Selig v. Pediatric Specialty Care, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 24 opinions
127 S.Ct. 3000 (2007)
John SELIG, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services, et al., petitioners,
No. 06-415.
John SELIG, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services, et al., petitioners,
v.
PEDIATRIC SPECIALTY CARE, INC., et al.
No. 06-415.
Supreme Court of United States.
June 25, 2007.On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated with respect to the individual capacity claims against Ray Hanley and Roy Jeffus, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit with instructions to dismiss the appeal as moot with respect to these claims. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).