Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Blankenship v. Parke Care Centers, Inc.

522 U.S. 1110

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1998-02-23
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that New Jersey's Megan's Law, which established sexual offender registration and community notification provisions, was nonpunitive and did not violate the double jeopardy or ex post facto clauses
  • noting that the “act of discrimination by the employer in such a case is not the harassment, but rather the inappropriate response to the charges of harassment”
  • describing sex offender registration and community notification components of New Jersey’s Megan’s Law scheme
  • action implemented by employer held to be “prompt and appropriate” where “[gjiven the circumstances before it, there was little else, if anything it could do”
  • New Jersey's law, which provides a tier process of imposing restrictions, was found not to violate the Ex Post Facto Clause

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Blankenship v. Parke Care Centers, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
122 opinions

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.