Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Texas v. New Mexico

Tex. v. N.M., 520 U.S. 1227 (1997)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1997-05-19
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • concerning military courts’ per se exclusion of polygraph evidence under Military Rule of Evidence 707, in review of United States v. Scheffer, 44 M.J. 442 (U.S.A.F.1996) (rejecting per se exclusion)
  • per se inadmissibility of polygraph examination results under Mil.R.Evid.707 unconstitutional
  • same, companion case to Scheffer

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Texas v. New Mexico. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
9 opinions

Motion of the River Master for fees and expenses granted, and the River Master is awarded $2,758 for the period January 1 through March 31, 1997, to be paid equally by the parties. [For earlier order herein, see, e. g., 519 U. S. 979.]