Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor
519 U.S. 957
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1996-11-01
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- where the Third Circuit held that since there were both present and future injury plaintiffs in the class, the future injury plaintiffs’ interests and incentives were in conflict with the representatives
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 7 opinions
C. A. 3d Cir. Motions of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. and National Association of Manufacturers for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certio-rari granted. Brief of petitioners is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, December 16, 1996. Briefs of respondents are to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Wednesday, January 15, 1997. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed