Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Martinez v. United States

Martinez v. United States, 513 U.S. 1179 (1995)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1995-02-21
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • noting cautionary instruction on eye-witness identification was not necessary and instructing jury that it was sole judge of witness credibility was proper
  • noting cautionary instruction on eye-witness identification was not necessary and instructing juiy that it was sole judge of witness credibility was proper
  • finding no prejudice to the defendant when the government disclosed Brady information to the defendant during its case-in-chief
  • burden of proof is on the defendant to show his right to dismissal under the Speedy Trial Act
  • callous nature of a crime is relevant to the determination of whether a capital defendant poses a continuing threat to society

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Martinez v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
98 opinions

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.