Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Millsaps v. Langsdon

510 U.S. 1160

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1994-02-28
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • affirming the district court’s ruling that the 1992 house redistricting plan violated the “one person, one vote” doctrine

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Millsaps v. Langsdon. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
6 opinions

510 U.S. 1160

Millsaps et al.
v.
Langsdon et al.

No. 93-1090.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 28, 1994.

1

Affirmed on appeal from D. C. W. D. Tenn. Reported below: 836 F. Supp. 447.