Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Voinovich v. Quilter

503 U.S. 979

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1992-04-20
Topic
bankruptcy

How later courts describe this case

  • remanding cause to circuit court in light of congressional amendment of § 13 limitations provisions proscribing retroactive application of Lampf
  • "Although the two concepts differ,” the terms statute of limitations and statute of repose “have become interchangeable.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Voinovich v. Quilter. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
36 opinions

Appeal from D. C. N. D. Ohio. Application to stay an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, filed March 17, 1992, and supplemented April 6, 1992, presented to Justice Stevens, and by him referred to the Court, granted, and it is ordered that the orders of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, case No. 5:91 CV 2219, entered March 10, 1992, and March 31, 1992, are stayed pending final disposition of the appeal by this Court.