Wold v. Wold

How later courts describe this case

• requiring evaluation of anticipated benefits of prices “at the time they were set ”
• "although ordinarily a panel must adhere to prior decisions of this court, our first duty is to follow the dictates of the United States Supreme Court."
• plaintiff alleged that Continental used below-cost pricing and discriminatory pricing to drive out competitors in the market for wholesale bread, injuring one of its competitors, the plaintiff
• Predatory pricing occurs when a competitor sets low prices in order to drive out competition so that it can later charge monopoly prices and reap monopoly profits.
• "If the criminal investigation is complete prior to the immunity grant, then immunity raises few problems.”
• “The purpose of Rule 15(d) is to promote as complete an adjudication of the dispute between the parties as possible by allowing the addition of claims which arise after the initial pleadings are filed.”
• where witness was murdered by the defendant for the purpose of procuring his silence, such statements could be admitted both to prove the facts asserted as well as the additional act of murdering the witness
• Court holds nondefendant may not be subject to result of criminal forfeiture proceeding