Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

McCarthy v. Bark Peking

459 U.S. 1166

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1983-01-24
Topic
bankruptcy

How later courts describe this case

  • finding discriminatory intent based in part on overt racial statements made by the chairman of the Georgia redistricting committee who “used the full power of his position and personality to insure passage of his desired Congressional plan”
  • reapportionment of congressional districts splitting composite black area to minimize possibility of electing a black candidate
  • revised statutes should not lightly be read as making a change, especially where the revisers placed no marginal comments suggesting an amendment next to section

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed McCarthy v. Bark Peking. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
49 opinions

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Director, *1167 OWCP v. Perini North River Associates, ante, p. 297.