Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Buford v. Florida
454 U.S. 1164
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1982-01-11
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- relying upon Durrett to determine whether nonjudicial foreclosure sale constituted “transfer” within meaning of Act
- reserving a ruling on whether a transfer for 21% of the equity is for reasonably equivalent value
- finding Miranda warning insufficient where suspect was not advised that "right to counsel encompassed the right to have counsel present during any questioning,” but admitting statement as harmless error
- suspect arrested in hotel hallway wearing a bathing suit and returned to his room
- interim report issued by staff of New York City Urban Mass Transit Administration is inadmissible because it includes only “tentative results of an incomplete staff investigation”
- delivery of ten subway cars for inspection and testing does not constitute tender of delivery so as to begin the running of the statute of limitations on claims
- evidence that has special aura of infallibility properly excluded under Rule 403
- although an injured buyer is under a duty to mitigate damages, the burden is on the breaching seller to show that its alternative option “was a viable means of reducing damages”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Buford v. Florida. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 143 opinions
Sup. Ct. Fla. Cer-tiorari denied.