Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Mori v. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers, Local Lodge No. 6
454 U.S. 1147
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1982-01-11
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- applying pre-UCC contract law principles to a letter of credit governed solely by the UCPDC
- Nigerian government's purchase of cement was a commercial activity irrespective of its purposes for so doing
- “Breach of an agreement is necessarily performed ‘in connection with’ that agreement, or with a series of similar agreements.”
- claims arising out of foreign country’s breach of contracts to purchase cement fall within commercial activity exception to immunity
- “[s]ince service [of process] was made under Section 1608, the relevant area in delineating contacts is the entire United States, not merely New York [the forum state]”
- in the case of a foreign corporation, the relevant inquiry is whether the corporation has suffered direct financial loss
- government of Nigeria liable for breach of contract for the purchase of nearly $1 billion worth of cement, even though it was to be used to build army barracks
- "Act of state analysis depends upon a careful case-by-case analysis of the extent to which the separation of powers concerns on which the doctrine is based are implicated by the action before the court."
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mori v. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers, Local Lodge No. 6. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 204 opinions
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.