Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Texas Petroleum Co. v. Compania Pelineon De Navegacion, S. A.
429 U.S. 1041
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1977-01-10
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that the prevention of a chilling effect on the First Amendment has little application where actual malice, the New York Times v. Sullivan standard, has been shown
- noting that “[c]onciliation rather than formal court proceedings remains the preferred method of settling [discrimination] disputes”
- upholding the exercise of personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state magazine publisher without mention of the first amendment
- affirming without discussion the district court's calculation of back pay award which had deducted unemployment insurance
- affirming judgment for section 1983 plaintiff based upon beatings by police officer.
- "... a non-tenured teacher has no 'expectancy' of continued employment, whatever may be the policies of the institution, where there exists a statutory tenure system."
- damages suffered when barge negligently severed power line to factory measured by value of lost production less saved expenses
- nontenured teacher has no expectancy of continued employment where there exists a statutory tenure system
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Texas Petroleum Co. v. Compania Pelineon De Navegacion, S. A.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 276 opinions
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.