Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive Board
414 U.S. 1091
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1973-12-10
- Topic
- employee-benefits-and-executive-compensation
How later courts describe this case
- to have a property interest in a benefit, a person must have a legitimate claim of entitlement to it
- N.L.R.B. decision "res judicata" on issue of liability in subsequent suit for damages
- property interests created and defined by rules and statutes
- “To have a property interest in a benefit, a person clearly must have more than an abstract need or desire for it. He must have more than a unilateral expectation of it. He must, instead, have a legitimate claim of entitlement to it.”
- applying the same test in the public employee context
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive Board. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 115 opinions
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted.