Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Chapman v. California
383 U.S. 956
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1966-03-28
- Topic
- general
Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion for leave to proceed-m forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari granted, limited to the following questions: "Where there is a violation of the rule of Griffin v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Chapman v. California. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion for leave to proceed-m forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari granted, limited to the following questions:
"Where there is a violation of the rule of Griffin v. California, 380 U. S. 609, (1) can the error be held to beMorris Lavine for petitioners. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Raymond M. Momboisse, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.*957 harmless, and (2) if so, was the error harmless in this case?”
Case transferred to the appellate docket.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.