Murphy v. Larkin

How later courts describe this case

• holding that a psychological examination of the petitioner, which had • been reported to the circuit court, showed that the petitioner’s sanity was an issue presented to the circuit court and could not later be considered on a petition for writ of error coram nobis
• stating that the mental examination of the petitioner by state hospital.' officials, which was reported to the trial court, showed that any possible claim of the petitioner’s insanity was before the trial court and could not later be considered in a petition for writ of error coram nobis
• stating that the mental examination of the petitioner by state hospital officials, which was reported to the circuit court, showed that any possible claim of the petitioner’s insanity was before the circuit court and could not later be considered on a petition for writ of error coram nobis
• sale/leaseback of apartment complex where partners had investment expertise