Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Arizona v. California
377 U.S. 921
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1964-05-04
- Topic
- general
The petition of the Special Master for the payment of an additional fee is granted, and, all of the parties agreeing thereto, the parties are ordered to make additional payments totaling $50,000 to Simon H. Rifkind, Esquire, Special Master, constituting the balance of full payment of. his compensation for his services as Special Master. Such additional payments are to be made in the following proportions: Arizona, 28%; California, 28%; United States, 28%; Nevada, 12%; New Mexico, 2%; and Utah, 2%. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Arizona v. California. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
The petition of the Special Master for the payment of an additional fee is granted, and, all of the parties agreeing thereto, the parties are ordered to make additional payments totaling $50,000 to Simon H. Rifkind, Esquire, Special Master, constituting the balance of full payment of. his compensation for his services as Special Master.
Such additional payments are to be made in the following proportions: Arizona, 28%; California, 28%; United States, 28%; Nevada, 12%; New Mexico, 2%; and Utah, 2%.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.