Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Male
375 U.S. 43
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1963-10-21
- Topic
- general
375 U.S. 43 (1963) HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. ET AL. v. MALE, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY, NEW JERSEY. No. 326. Supreme Court of United States.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Male. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
375 U.S. 43 (1963)
HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. ET AL.
No. 326.
HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. ET AL.
v.
MALE, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY, NEW JERSEY.
No. 326.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided October 21, 1963. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.T. Girard Wharton and John W. Fritz for appellants.
Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Theodore I. Botter, First Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.