Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

New Jersey v. New York

N.J. v. N.Y., 346 U.S. 882 (1953)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1953-11-16
Topic: commercial

ante, p. 853. The applications of New *883Jersey and Pennsylvania for an extension of time within which to answer the amended petition of the City of New York are granted and the time is extended to and including December 14, next. Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney General, and Robert Peacock, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of New Jersey. Frank F.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed New Jersey v. New York. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

ante, p. 853. The applications of New *883 Jersey and Pennsylvania for an extension of time within which to answer the amended petition of the City of New York are granted and the time is extended to and including December 14, next.

Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney General, and Robert Peacock, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of New Jersey. Frank F. Truscott, Attorney General, and Wrn. A. Schnader for the State of Pennsylvania.