Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Baker v. Grossjean

Baker v. Grossjean, 311 U.S. 618 (1940)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1940-11-18
Topic: general

Per Curiam: The motions for leave to file supplemental statements as to jurisdiction are granted.. *619The appeals are dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Lent v. Tillson, 140 U. S. 316, 328; Paulsen v. Portland, 149 U.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Baker v. Grossjean. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Per Curiam:

The motions for leave to file supplemental statements as to jurisdiction are granted.. *619 The appeals are dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Lent v. Tillson, 140 U. S. 316, 328; Paulsen v. Portland, 149 U. S. 30, 40; North Laramie Land Co. v. Hoffman, 268 U. S. 276, 283; Fidelity National Bank v. Swope, 274 U. S. 123, 130.

Mr. Horace C. Young for appellants. Mr. Nat Tipton for appellees.