Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Huger v. South Carolina
Huger v. S.C., 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 339 (1797)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1797-02-15
- Topic
- general
BILL in Equity. A fubpcena had been iffued in this caufe, agreeably to the rule; and an affidavit of the fervice was now read, in which it was fet forth, that a copy had been delivered to the Attorney General; and that a copy had been left *340at -Governor’s houfe, where the original had, likewife, been ihewli to the Secretary of -the State, *341Iredell and Chase, JuJlices, expreffed fame doubt, whether ftewing the original to the Secretary of State, would *342have been a fervice of the procefs, conformably to the rule, without leaving a copy at the Governor's houfe: but they agreed with the reft of'FHE COURT, in deeming the fervice, under the prefent circumftances, to be fufficient in ftri&nefs of con-. ffruv~tion, as well as upon principle. `Ihe tervice of the fubpcena being thus proved, the Uom.-plainant gras entitled to proceed ex ~arte; and, accordingly, moved for and obtained Commiffions, to take the examination ~f witneffes in feveral of the States.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Huger v. South Carolina. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
BILL in Equity. A fubpcena had been iffued in this caufe, agreeably to the rule; and an affidavit of the fervice was now read, in which it was fet forth, that a copy had been delivered to the Attorney General; and that a copy had been left
expreffed fame doubt, whether ftewing the original to the Secretary of State, would
`Ihe tervice of the fubpcena being thus proved, the Uom.-plainant gras entitled to proceed ex ~arte; and, accordingly, moved for and obtained Commiffions, to take the examination ~f witneffes in feveral of the States.