Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Montana v. United States

290 U.S. 593

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1933-11-13
Topic: general

Per Curiam: Decree *594affirmed. United States v. Louisiana, ante, p. 70. Mr. Raymond T.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Montana v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 4 opinions

Per Curiam:

Decree *594 affirmed.

United States v. Louisiana, ante, p. 70. Mr. Raymond T. Nagle, Attorney General of Montana, and Mr. Francis A. Silver were on the brief for appellants. Solicitor General Biggs and Messrs. Elmer B. Collins, Daniel W. Knowlton, and Edward Ml Reidy were on the brief for the United States and Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees. Messrs. M. L. Countryman, Jr., D. F. Lyons,' J. N. Davis, Walter McFarland, J. M. Souby-, Conrad Olson, and F. G. Dorety were on the brief for the railway companies, appellees. Messrs. John E. Benton and Clyde S. Bailey, by leave of Court, filed a brief on behalf of the National Association of Railroad and Utilities Commissioners, as amicus curiae.