Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Arneson v. United Irrigation Co.

284 U.S. 592

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1932-01-18
Topic: general

Per Curiam: The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the decree of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based on non-federal grounds adequate to support it (Parson Son *593& Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268; Browne v. Union Pacific R. Co., 267 U.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Arneson v. United Irrigation Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 10 opinions

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the decree of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based on non-federal grounds adequate to support it (Parson Son *593 & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268; Browne v. Union Pacific R. Co., 267 U. S. 255; Live Oak Water Users’ Assn. v. Railroad Commission, 269 U. S. 354, 359; Security National Bank v. Twinde, 278 U. S. 659; Garysburg Mfg. Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 280 U. S. 520); and for the want of a substantial federal question (Wabash Ry. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191).

Mr. S. J. Brooks, with whom Mr. W. L. Matthews was on the brief, for appellants. Messrs. J. Q. Henry, pro hac vice, by leave of Court, and John A. Mobley, with whom Mr. W. L. Cook was on the brief, for appellees.