Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
First Addition to the Rattle Snake Drainage District v. Bodeman
First Addition to the Rattle Snake Drainage Dist. v. Bodeman, 280 U.S. 527 (1929)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1929-12-09
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam: The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question, on the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed First Addition to the Rattle Snake Drainage District v. Bodeman. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question, on the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925 (c. 229, 43 Stat. 936, 938), the certiorari is denied.