Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Northern Cedar Co. v. Gloyd

N. Cedar Co. v. Gloyd, 270 U.S. 625 (1926)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1926-01-18
Topic
general

Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission, 226 U. S. 99, 101; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Northern Cedar Co. v. Gloyd. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission, 226 U. S. 99, 101; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418, 419; Gray’s Harbor Logging Co. v. Coats-Ford *626 ney Logging Co., 243 U. S. 251, 255; Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S, 18, 19.

Mr. Dallas v. Halverstadt for plaintiffs,in error. Mr. John H. Dunbar for defendants in error.