Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Molinari v. Maryland
263 U.S. 685
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1924-01-07
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. Mr. Clarence Lippel, with whom Mr. Arch A. Young and Mr.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Molinari v. Maryland. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
Per Curiam. Mr. Clarence Lippel, with whom Mr. Arch A. Young and Mr. Carl G. Mullin were on the brief, for plaintiff in error in No. 127. Mr. Saul Praeger, with whom Mr. Joseph N. Ülman and Mr. G. Tyler Smith were, on the brief, for plaintiff in error in No. 480. Mr. Alexander Armstrong and ■ Mr. Lindsay C. Spencer appeared for defendant in error.
Affirmed with costs upon, the authority of: (1) Vigliotti v. Pennsylvania, 258 U. S. 403; (2) Forsyth v. Hammond, 166 U. S. 506, 518; Commissioners v. Bancroft, 203 U. S. 112, 118-119; St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. Arkansas, 235 U. S. 350, 362.