Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Stettler v. O'Hara
243 U.S. 629
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1917-04-09
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. Judgments affirmed with costs by an equally divided court. (Mr. Justice Brandéis took no part in the consideration and decision of these cases.) Mr. Felix Frankfurter, Mr.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Stettler v. O'Hara. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 25 opinions
Per Curiam.
Judgments affirmed with costs by an equally divided court. (Mr. Justice Brandéis took no part in the consideration and decision of these cases.)
Mr. Felix Frankfurter, Mr. A. M. Crawford, Mr. J. N. Teal and Mr. Geo. M. Brown for defendants in error.