Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Beecroft v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Beecroft v. Great N. Ry. Co., 242 U.S. 618 (1916)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1916-12-11
Topic
general

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs on the authority of Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Beecroft v. Great Northern Railway Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
13 opinions
Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs on the authority of Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 673; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Knapp, 240 U. S. 464; Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Whitacre, ante, 169. Mr. Tom Davis and Mr. Ernest A. Michel for the plaintiff in error. Mr. E. C. Bindley, Mr. A. L. Janes and Mr. M. L. Countryman for the defendant in error.