Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Henry E. Meeker, Surviving Partner, Etc. v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company
234 U.S. 749
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1914-04-13
- Topic
- general
234 U.S. 749 34 S.Ct. 674 58 L.Ed. 1576 HENRY E. MEEKER, Surviving Partner, etc., Petitioner, v. LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY. No. 1000. HENRY E.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Henry E. Meeker, Surviving Partner, Etc. v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
HENRY E. MEEKER, Surviving Partner, etc., Petitioner,
v.
LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY.
No. 1000.
HENRY E. MEEKER, Petitioner,
v.
LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY.
No. 1001.
Supreme Court of the United States
April 13, 1914
Mr. Wm. A. Glasgow, Jr., for petitioner.
No counsel appeared for respondent.
Per Curiam:
Petitions granted, upon the authority of § 262 of the Judicial Code [36 Stat. at L. 1162, chap. 231, U. S. Comp. Stat. Supp. 1911, p. 235]. Re Chetwood, 165 U. S. 443, 462, 41 L. ed. 782, 788, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 385; Whitney v. Dick, 202 U. S. 132, 50 L. ed. 963, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 584; McClellan v. Carland, 217 U. S. 268, 54 L. ed. 762, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 501; United States v. Beatty, 232 U. S. 463, 467, 58 L. ed.——, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 392.
Mr. Joseph W. Folk and Mr. C. W. Needham, by leave of court, filed a brief herein in behalf of the Interstate Commerce Commission.