Opinion · United States Tax Court

Estate of Collins v. Commissioner

31 T.C. 238

Type
Opinion
Court
United States Tax Court
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1958-10-30
Topic
general

OPINION. Kern, Judge: The first issue involved in the instant case is whether respondent erred in his determination “that the 68 lots in Unit 2, Rodney Subdivision, sold * * * in 1951 were held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business within the meaning of section ITT (a) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1989 and that the entire gain realized from the sale of these lots is taxable as ordinary income.” Petitioners, relying on the fact that title to the subdivision was taken in the name of Lila T. Collins, a housewife, contend that it was purchased for her as an investment by her husband to whom she had turned over funds of her own “from time to time,” that the sales activities of her husband, M. A. Collins, could not be attributed to her, and, even if they could, they were not “the usual activities associated with one in the real estate business.” This contention is without merit.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Estate of Collins v. Commissioner. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
8 opinions