Opinion · Florida Court Opinions

HENDERSON v. STATE, 962 So.2d 336 (Fla. 2007)

JESSE JAMES HENDERSON, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF Fla., Respondent(s)., 962 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 2007)

Type
Opinion
Court
Florida Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Florida
Date
2007-06-26
Topic
general

HENDERSON v. STATE, 962 So.2d 336 (Fla. 2007) JESSE JAMES HENDERSON, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s). No. SC06-2441.Supreme Court of Florida.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed HENDERSON v. STATE, 962 So.2d 336 (Fla. 2007). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

HENDERSON v. STATE,962 So.2d 336(Fla. 2007)
JESSE JAMES HENDERSON, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s).
No. SC06-2441.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 26, 2007.
Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied.See Huffman v. State,813 So. 2d 10,11(Fla. 2000) (stating that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, petitioner must show clear legal right to performance of requested act, that respondent has indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).

WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, and BELL, JJ., concur.