Opinion · Fllaw Florida

DOMINGO, ET AL., v. STATE, 150 Fla. 806 (1942)

9 So.2d 195

Type
Opinion
Court
Fllaw Florida
Jurisdiction
Fllaw
Date
1942-07-24
Topic
general

DOMINGO, ET AL., v. STATE, 150 Fla. 806 (1942) 9 So.2d 195 FRANK DOMINGO and G. V. LOPEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDASupreme Court of Florida.Division B May 29, 1942Rehearing Denied July 24, 1942 An appeal from the Criminal Court of Record for Hillsborough County, John R.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed DOMINGO, ET AL., v. STATE, 150 Fla. 806 (1942). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

DOMINGO, ET AL., v. STATE,150 Fla. 806(1942)
9 So.2d 195
FRANK DOMINGO and G. V. LOPEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Supreme Court of Florida.
Division B
May 29, 1942
Rehearing Denied July 24, 1942
An appeal from the Criminal Court of Record for Hillsborough County, John R. Himes, Judge.
Cyrus W. Fields, for appellants.

J. Tom Watson, Attorney General, Millard B. Conklin, Assistant Attorney General, and Woodrow M. Melvin, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM:
The questions presented in this case are identical with two of those disposed of by the opinion in Tony LaBarbara, appellant, v. State of Florida, appellee, filed 29 May 1942. On authority of that decision the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.