Opinion · Florida Court Opinions

STATE v. PAWLOSKI, 718 So.2d 1264 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. 1998)

STATE OF Fla., Appellant, v. JAMES PAWLOSKI, Appellee., 718 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Type
Opinion
Court
Florida Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Florida
Date
1998-10-09
Topic
general

STATE v. PAWLOSKI, 718 So.2d 1264 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. 1998) STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. JAMES PAWLOSKI, Appellee. No. 97-05082District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. October 9, 1998.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. PAWLOSKI, 718 So.2d 1264 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. 1998). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. PAWLOSKI,718 So.2d 1264(Fla.App. 2 Dist. 1998)
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. JAMES PAWLOSKI, Appellee.
No. 97-05082
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
October 9, 1998.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Anthony Rondolino, Judge.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Patricia E. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant.

Walter L. Grantham, Jr., Clearwater, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The issue presented in this appeal was addressed inState v. Cunningham,712 So.2d 1221(Fla. 2d DCA 1998), i.e., whether section794.05, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1996) (the Statutory Rape Law), is an unconstitutional violation of the right to privacy. We concluded inCunninghamthat the statute did not violate the right to privacy and that the statute was, therefore, constitutional. Since the trial court here found the statute unconstitutional, we must reverse.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BLUE and CASANUEVA, JJ., concur.