Opinion · Florida Court Opinions

BEAUDOIN v. STATE, 658 So.2d 663 (Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1995)

RONALD J. BEAUDOIN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF Fla., APPELLEE., 658 So. 2d 663 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Type
Opinion
Court
Florida Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Florida
Date
1995-08-02
Topic
general

BEAUDOIN v. STATE, 658 So.2d 663 (Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1995) RONALD J. BEAUDOIN, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE. No. 95-1632.District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BEAUDOIN v. STATE, 658 So.2d 663 (Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1995). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BEAUDOIN v. STATE,658 So.2d 663(Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1995)
RONALD J. BEAUDOIN, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.
No. 95-1632.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
August 2, 1995.
Rehearing Denied August 23, 1995.
An Appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) from the Circuit Court for Monroe County; Steven P. Shea, Judge.Page 664
Ronald J. Beaudoin, in pro. per.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Elliot B. Kula, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and BASKIN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
In accordance with the state's candid and well-taken partial confession of error, the denial of rule 3.800 relief below is reversed as to the habitual offender sentence imposed upon the appellant for count three of the information, which charged a life felony. §775.087(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1993); seeLamont v.State,610 So.2d 435(Fla. 1992). The cause is remanded for resentencing as to that count alone. The order under review is otherwise affirmed.