Opinion · Florida Court Opinions

CAMPBELL v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, 657 So.2d 67 (Fla.App. 1 Dist. 1995)

CALVIN CARLOS CAMPBELL, APPELLANT, v. Fla. PAROLE Comm’n, APPELLEE., 657 So. 2d 67 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Type
Opinion
Court
Florida Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Florida
Date
1995-07-11
Topic
general

CAMPBELL v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, 657 So.2d 67 (Fla.App. 1 Dist. 1995) CALVIN CARLOS CAMPBELL, APPELLANT, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, APPELLEE. No. 92-3797.District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. July 11, 1995.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CAMPBELL v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, 657 So.2d 67 (Fla.App. 1 Dist. 1995). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CAMPBELL v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION,657 So.2d 67(Fla.App. 1 Dist. 1995)
CALVIN CARLOS CAMPBELL, APPELLANT, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, APPELLEE.
No. 92-3797.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
July 11, 1995.
An appeal from Circuit Court for Leon County; N. Sanders Sauls, Judge.
Calvin Carlos Campbell, Punta Gorda, pro se.

James S. Byrd of Florida Parole Com'n, Tallahassee, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We previously affirmed in part and reversed in part an order of the trial court denying the appellant's petition for writ of mandamus.See Campbell v. Florida Parole Commission,630 So.2d 1210(Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Thereafter, upon petition for certiorari, the United States Supreme Court, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 1819, 131 L.Ed.2d 742 (1995), vacated our judgment and remanded the case to this court for further proceedings not inconsistent withCalifornia Department of Corrections v.Morales,___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 1597, 131 L.Ed.2d 588 (1995). Having reconsidered our earlier opinion, and finding nothing therein inconsistent withMorales,we hereby reinstate our earlier opinion and decision.

ERVIN and ALLEN, JJ., and SMITH, Senior Judge, concur.