Opinion · Fllaw Florida

SEABOARD SURETY v. FASTENING DRILLING, 602 So.2d 995 (Fla.App. 4 Dist. 1992)

602 So.2d 995

Type
Opinion
Court
Fllaw Florida
Jurisdiction
Fllaw
Date
1992-08-12
Topic
general

SEABOARD SURETY v. FASTENING DRILLING, 602 So.2d 995 (Fla.App. 4 Dist. 1992) SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY AND CARLSON SOUTHEAST CORPORATION N/K/A THE CARLSONCORPORATION-SOUTHEAST, APPELLANTS, v. FASTENING DRILLING AND SAWING, INC.,APPELLEE. No. 91-2547.District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. August 12, 1992.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SEABOARD SURETY v. FASTENING DRILLING, 602 So.2d 995 (Fla.App. 4 Dist. 1992). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SEABOARD SURETY v. FASTENING DRILLING,602 So.2d 995(Fla.App. 4 Dist. 1992)
SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY AND CARLSON SOUTHEAST CORPORATION N/K/A THE CARLSON
CORPORATION-SOUTHEAST, APPELLANTS, v. FASTENING DRILLING AND SAWING, INC.,
APPELLEE.
No. 91-2547.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
August 12, 1992.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Patti Englander Henning, Judge.
Alberto A. Macia of Shea Gould, Miami, for appellants.

No appearance for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellants, Seaboard Surety Company and Carlson Southeast Corporation, appeal from an order of the trial court denying their motion to vacate a final judgment against them. The final judgment was entered upon a default judgment that the trial court erroneously entered after the appellants had both filed answers to the complaint.

Without detailing the various oversights as to the status of the record by the trial court and appellee, we simply hold the court was not in a position to enter a default against appellants and, thus, we must reverse the judgment appealed from and remand the cause for further proceedings.

DOWNEY, STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.