Opinion · Louisiana Court Opinions

INGRAM v. HANOVER INS. CO., 594 So.2d 987 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1992)

JOSEPH B. INGRAM & KAREN INGRAM, D/B/A INGRAMS' SUPERMARKET,PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. HANOVER Ins. Co., ET AL.,DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS., 594 So. 2d 987 (3d Cir. 1992)

Type
Opinion
Court
Louisiana Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Louisiana
Date
1992-02-12
Topic
general

INGRAM v. HANOVER INS. CO., 594 So.2d 987 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1992) JOSEPH B. INGRAM AND KAREN INGRAM, D/B/A INGRAMS' SUPERMARKET,PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.,DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed INGRAM v. HANOVER INS. CO., 594 So.2d 987 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1992). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

INGRAM v. HANOVER INS. CO.,594 So.2d 987(La.App. 3 Cir. 1992)
JOSEPH B. INGRAM AND KAREN INGRAM, D/B/A INGRAMS' SUPERMARKET,
PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
No. 89-1299.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
February 12, 1992.
APPEAL FROM NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF RAPIDES, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE WM. POLK, J.
Provosty, Sadler deLaunay, Ronald J. Fiorenza, Wm. deLaunay, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellee Joseph Ingram.

Antoon Dalrymple, Joseph Dalrymple, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellee Karen Ingram.

Gist, Methvin, Hughes Munsterman, David Hughes, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellant Great American.

Cook, Yancey, King Galloway, John D. Collinsworth, Shreveport, for plaintiff-appellant State Farm.

Bolen, Erwin, Johnson Coleman, L. Gay Coleman, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellee Hanover.

Lunn, Irion, Johnson, Salley Carlisle, Brian Coody, Shreveport, for defendant-appellee Gaspard.

Lefant Associates, Steven M. DuValle, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee Standard.
Before STOKER, DOUCET and KING, JJ.West Page 988
KING, Judge.
[1] For the reasons assigned in the consolidated case ofGreat American Insurance Company v. Gaspard,594 So.2d 981(La.App. 3 Cir. 1992), the judgment of the trial court is amended to increase the judgment awarded to Hanover Insurance Company against Skip Converse, Inc. and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company by $90,969.24, and, as amended, is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are taxed one-half to Skip Converse, Inc. and one-half to State Farm Fire and Casualty Company.

[2] AMENDED AND AFFIRMED.