Opinion · Louisiana Court Opinions

SHOEMANN v. AETNA LIFE CASUALTY, 559 So.2d 1345 (La. 1990)

RUDOLPH R. SCHOEMANN, III v. AETNA LIFE Cas. CO., ET AL.CONSOLIDATED WITH RUDOLPH R. SCHOEMANN, III v. Gov’t EMPLOYEESINSURANCE COMPANY., 559 So. 2d 1345 (La. 1990)

Type: Opinion
Court: Louisiana Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Date: 1990-04-20
Topic: general

SHOEMANN v. AETNA LIFE CASUALTY, 559 So.2d 1345 (La. 1990) RUDOLPH R. SCHOEMANN, III v. AETNA LIFE CASUALTY CO., ET AL.CONSOLIDATED WITH RUDOLPH R. SCHOEMANN, III v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SHOEMANN v. AETNA LIFE CASUALTY, 559 So.2d 1345 (La. 1990). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SHOEMANN v. AETNA LIFE CASUALTY,559 So.2d 1345(La. 1990)

RUDOLPH R. SCHOEMANN, III v. AETNA LIFE CASUALTY CO., ET AL.

CONSOLIDATED WITH RUDOLPH R. SCHOEMANN, III v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES

INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 90-C-0622.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 1990.

In re American Service Life Ins. Co.; — Third Party; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Number 88ca-1658, 88ca-2086; Parish of Orleans Civil District Court Div. "H" Number 86-3842, 87-20430.

[1] Denied.

[2] MARCUS and SHORTESS, JJ., would grant to amend the court of appeal judgment to order that the judgment in favor of American Service Life Insurance Company and against Rudolph R. Schoemann, III, be unrestricted.West Page 1346