Opinion · Louisiana Court Opinions

STATE EX REL. LAMISON v. CLERK OF COURT, 515 So.2d 807 (La. 1987)

STATE EX REL. CHARLES LAMISON v. CLERK OF COURT, CRIMINAL Dist. COURT,PARISH OF ORLEANS-G., 515 So. 2d 807 (La. 1987)

Type: Opinion
Court: Louisiana Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Date: 1987-11-07
Topic: general

STATE EX REL. LAMISON v. CLERK OF COURT, 515 So.2d 807 (La. 1987) STATE EX REL. CHARLES LAMISON v. CLERK OF COURT, CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT,PARISH OF ORLEANS-G.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE EX REL. LAMISON v. CLERK OF COURT, 515 So.2d 807 (La. 1987). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE EX REL. LAMISON v. CLERK OF COURT,515 So.2d 807(La. 1987)

STATE EX REL. CHARLES LAMISON v. CLERK OF COURT, CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT,

PARISH OF ORLEANS-G.

No. 87-KH-1879.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 7, 1987.

In re Lamison, Charles; applying for remedial writ and writ of mandamus; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. "G", No. 285-339.

[1] The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion he has filed to correct an illegal sentence. If relator's representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.