Opinion · Louisiana Court Opinions

STATE EX REL. LAMISON v. CLERK OF COURT, 515 So.2d 807 (La. 1987)

STATE EX REL. CHARLES LAMISON v. CLERK OF COURT, CRIMINAL Dist. COURT,PARISH OF ORLEANS-G., 515 So. 2d 807 (La. 1987)

Type: Opinion
Court: Louisiana Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Date: 1987-11-07
Topic: general

STATE EX REL. LAMISON v. CLERK OF COURT, 515 So.2d 807 (La. 1987) STATE EX REL. CHARLES LAMISON v. CLERK OF COURT, CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT,PARISH OF ORLEANS-G.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE EX REL. LAMISON v. CLERK OF COURT, 515 So.2d 807 (La. 1987). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending

STATE EX REL. LAMISON v. CLERK OF COURT,515 So.2d 807(La. 1987)

STATE EX REL. CHARLES LAMISON v. CLERK OF COURT, CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT,

PARISH OF ORLEANS-G.

No. 87-KH-1879.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 7, 1987.

In re Lamison, Charles; applying for remedial writ and writ of mandamus; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. "G", No. 285-339.

[1] The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion he has filed to correct an illegal sentence. If relator's representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.