Opinion · Louisiana Court Opinions

STATE EX REL. McDONALD v. 24TH JUD. DIST. CT., 513 So.2d 298 (La. 1987)

STATE EX REL. TRUMAN E. McDONALD v. 24TH JUDICIAL Dist. COURT,PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA., 513 So. 2d 298 (La. 1987)

Type: Opinion
Court: Louisiana Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Date: 1987-10-13
Topic: general

STATE EX REL. McDONALD v. 24TH JUD. DIST. CT., 513 So.2d 298 (La. 1987) STATE EX REL. TRUMAN E.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE EX REL. McDONALD v. 24TH JUD. DIST. CT., 513 So.2d 298 (La. 1987). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE EX REL. McDONALD v. 24TH JUD. DIST. CT.,513 So.2d 298(La. 1987)

STATE EX REL. TRUMAN E. McDONALD v. 24TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT,

PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA.

No. 87-KH-2194.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 13, 1987.

In re McDonald, Truman E.; applying for writ of mandamus; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. "J", No. 68558.

[1] Granted. The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for post-conviction relief. If relator's representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.West Page 299-301

[EDITORS' NOTE: Firefighter's Retirement System v. Parker, Page 299-301, was withdrawn from the bound volume because a joint motion to dismiss was granted.