Opinion · Supreme Court of Alabama
Ex Parte Watson
398 So. 2d 332
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Alabama
- Jurisdiction
- Alabama
- Date
- 1981-02-20
- Topic
- general
The Petitioner has not employed either ARAP 10 (f) or 39 (k) to present the issue he asserts. Therefore, the merits of his contention are not before us, and we are, therefore, compelled to deny his petition, 398 So.2d 320. WRIT DENIED. TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, JONES, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ex Parte Watson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 22 opinions
The Petitioner has not employed either ARAP 10 (f) or 39 (k) to present the issue he asserts. Therefore, the merits of his contention are not before us, and we are, therefore, compelled to deny his petition, 398 So.2d 320.
WRIT DENIED.
TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, JONES, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.