Opinion · Supreme Court of Alabama
Huffman v. State
Huffman v. State, 360 So. 2d 1045 (Ala. 1978)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Alabama
- Jurisdiction
- Alabama
- Date
- 1978-07-14
- Topic
- general
The Court of Criminal Appeals, 360 So.2d 1038, on original deliverance, properly pretermitted review of the defendant's contention that remarks of the prosecutor in closing argument require reversal, because argument of counsel was not included in the record on appeal. The record has now been supplemented under ARAP 10 (f) and we have thoroughly reviewed it after hearing oral argument by the petitioner. We find no reversible error and, therefore, affirm the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals. AFFIRMED. All the Justices concur.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Huffman v. State. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 5 opinions
The Court of Criminal Appeals, 360 So.2d 1038, on original deliverance, properly pretermitted review of the defendant's contention that remarks of the prosecutor in closing argument require reversal, because argument of counsel was not included in the record on appeal.
The record has now been supplemented under ARAP 10 (f) and we have thoroughly reviewed it after hearing oral argument by the petitioner. We find no reversible error and, therefore, affirm the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals.
AFFIRMED.
All the Justices concur.