Opinion · Louisiana Court Opinions

STATE THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. JAMES, 324 So.2d 812 (La. 1976)

STATE OF La., THROUGH THE Dep’t OF HIGHWAYS v. EVELYN SMITHJAMES, 324 So. 2d 812 (La. 1976)

Type: Opinion
Court: Louisiana Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Date: 1976-01-16
Topic: general

STATE THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. JAMES, 324 So.2d 812 (La. 1976) STATE OF LOUISIANA, THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. EVELYN SMITHJAMES ET AL. No. 57264.Supreme Court of Louisiana. January 16, 1976.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. JAMES, 324 So.2d 812 (La. 1976). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. JAMES,324 So.2d 812(La. 1976)

STATE OF LOUISIANA, THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. EVELYN SMITH

JAMES ET AL.

No. 57264.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 16, 1976.

In re: Evelyn Smith James and Louis Joseph James applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of West Baton Rouge.

[1] Writ refused. The issues are essentially factual. On the facts found by the court of appeal, there is no error of law.

[2] SUMMERS, TATE and DIXON, JJ., dissent. The strong showing of arbitrary appellate re-evaluation of facts justifies further review.West Page 813