Opinion · Florida Court Opinions

PRIESTELY v. CHANDLER, 312 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1975)

MYRTLE PRIESTELY, Emp., & AETNA Cas. & Sur. Co., CARRIER,PETITIONERS, v. ROSALIE CHANDLER, CLAIMANT, & Fla. Dep’t OFCOMMERCE, Indus. RELATIONS Comm’n, RESPONDENTS., 312 So. 2d 758 (Fla. 1975)

Type: Opinion
Court: Florida Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Florida
Date: 1975-04-25
Topic: general

PRIESTELY v. CHANDLER, 312 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1975) MYRTLE PRIESTELY, EMPLOYER, AND AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, CARRIER,PETITIONERS, v. ROSALIE CHANDLER, CLAIMANT, AND FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OFCOMMERCE, INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS. No. 45864.Supreme Court of Florida. April 25, 1975.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PRIESTELY v. CHANDLER, 312 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1975). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PRIESTELY v. CHANDLER,312 So.2d 758(Fla. 1975)

MYRTLE PRIESTELY, EMPLOYER, AND AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, CARRIER,

PETITIONERS, v. ROSALIE CHANDLER, CLAIMANT, AND FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF

COMMERCE, INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS.

No. 45864.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 25, 1975.

Certiorari denied.

ADKINS, C.J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and OVERTON, JJ., concur.