Opinion · District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wright v. State

309 So. 2d 557

Type
Opinion
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Jurisdiction
Florida
Date
1975-03-26
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. Appellant’s conviction and sentence entered pursuant to a jury verdict for the offenses of assault with intent to commit murder in the second degree (three counts), aggravated assault, and resisting arrest without violence, is affirmed, there being no demonstration of reversible error in the proceedings below. Affirmed. BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and McCord, JJ., concur.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Wright v. State. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s conviction and sentence entered pursuant to a jury verdict for the offenses of assault with intent to commit murder in the second degree (three counts), aggravated assault, and resisting arrest without violence, is affirmed, there being no demonstration of reversible error in the proceedings below.

Affirmed.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and McCord, JJ., concur.