Opinion · Fllaw Florida

HENDRY CORP. v. PHOENIX ASSURANCE CO. OF NEW YORK, 277 So.2d 532 (Fla. 1973)

277 So.2d 532

Type
Opinion
Court
Fllaw Florida
Jurisdiction
Fllaw
Date
1973-05-02
Topic
general

HENDRY CORP. v. PHOENIX ASSURANCE CO. OF NEW YORK, 277 So.2d 532 (Fla. 1973) HENDRY CORPORATION, ETC., PETITIONER, v. PHOENIX ASSURANCE COMPANY OF NEWYORK, RESPONDENT. No. 43003.Supreme Court of Florida.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed HENDRY CORP. v. PHOENIX ASSURANCE CO. OF NEW YORK, 277 So.2d 532 (Fla. 1973). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

HENDRY CORP. v. PHOENIX ASSURANCE CO. OF NEW YORK,277 So.2d 532(Fla. 1973)
HENDRY CORPORATION, ETC., PETITIONER, v. PHOENIX ASSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW
YORK, RESPONDENT.
No. 43003.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 2, 1973.
Rehearing Denied June 5, 1973.
Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Second District,267 So.2d 92.
John W. Frost, II, Holland Knight, Bartow, for petitioner.

Dewey R. Villareal, Jr., Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey, Kinney Boggs, Tampa, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C.J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.Page 533