Opinion · District Court of Appeal of Florida

Marlin v. State

268 So. 2d 548

Type: Opinion
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Jurisdiction: Florida
Date: 1972-11-21
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of Rule 3.300 CrPR, 33 F.S.A.; State v. Silva, Fla.1970, 259 So.2d 153; and State v. Bethel, Fla. App.1972, 268 So.2d 557 (released November 7, 1972).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Marlin v. State. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

MARLIN v. STATE,268 So.2d 548(Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1972)

BILLIE RAY MARLIN, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

No. 72-122.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 21, 1972.

Rehearing Denied December 5, 1972.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record for Dade County; Paul Baker, Judge.

Fred A. Jones, Jr., Miami, and Allen L. Jacobi, Miami Beach for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Rule 3.300 CrPR, 33 F.S.A.; State v. Silva, Fla. 1970,259 So.2d 153; and State v. Bethel, Fla. App. 1972,268 So.2d 557(released November 7, 1972).