Opinion · District Court of Appeal of Florida
Johnson v. State
Johnson v. State, 267 So. 2d 114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Date
- 1972-10-06
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- “Appellant raises for the first time on appeal questions which must first be submitted to the trial court pursuant to [Fla. R.Crim. P.] 3.850.... There is no reversible error shown.”
- where defendant raised for the first time on appeal questions which Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 required to be first submitted to trial court, judgment of conviction would be affirmed without prejudice to defendant's right to seek post-conviction relief
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Johnson v. State. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
PER CURIAM.
Appellant raises for the first time on appeal questions which must first be submitted to the trial court pursuant to Cr.P.R. 3.850, 33 F.S.A. There is no reversible error shown. See Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App.2d 1969, 228 So.2d 446. The judgment is affirmed without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek post-conviction relief under Rule 3.850.
PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON and MANN, JJ., concur.