Opinion · Supreme Court of Louisiana

Central Louisiana Telephone Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission

261 La. 1038

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Date: 1972-05-18
Topic: bankruptcy

(See order). The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered, It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Lewis S. Doherty III, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 9th day of June, 1972, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in *1040duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained. It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted. It is further ordered that, in the meantime and until the further orders of this court all proceedings against the relator in said 19th Judicial District Court shall be stayed and suspended.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Central Louisiana Telephone Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

(See order).

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Lewis S. Doherty III, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 9th day of June, 1972, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in *1040 duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

It is further ordered that, in the meantime and until the further orders of this court all proceedings against the relator in said 19th Judicial District Court shall be stayed and suspended.